About Me

Ryan Permeh

Ryan Permeh

Read More

Enterprise Blogs

Feeds & Podcasts

Meet the Bloggers

Archive

Tags

#McAfeeFOCUS, #MFETrivia, #SecChat, #SecurityLegos, 12 Scams of Christmas, 2012, 2012 Security Predictions, Acquisition, Advanced Persistent Threat, Android, android antivirus, Android Malware, Android security, android security app, anti-phishing, anti-theft, anti-virus, antivirus, APIs, App Alert, Apple, application blacklisting, application developers, application security, app protection, apps, app safety, ATM scams, attacks, authentication, automotive, Bad Apps, balanced scorecard, best practices, Big Data, BlackBerry, Black Hat, Blackhat, black hat hackers, botnet, Brazil, breach, Business IT, car hacking, certification, Change Control, China, CISO Executive Summit, Citrix, class action lawsuit, cloud, Cloud city, Cloud computing, Cloud Expo, cloud security, Cofer Black, collaboration, Compliance, Conficker, consolidation, Consumer, consumerization, consumerization of IT, Content Protection, counter identity theft, credit card fraud and protection, credit card skimming, critical infrastructure, CSP, cyber attack, Cybercrime, cyberespionage, Cyber Insurance, Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011, cybersecurity, cyber security, cyber security awareness, Cyber Security Mom, cyber threat, cyberthreats, data, database activity monitoring, database security, data breach, Datacenter, data center, data center security, Data Classification, data loss, Data Loss Prevention, Data Protection, Data Protection Act, Dave DeWalt, Dave Marcus, dedicated security appliances, Deep Command, Deep Defender, DeepSAFE, DefCon, DefCon Kids, Department of Commerce, device, Device Control, devices, dewalt, DLP, Dmitri Alperovitch, easter, Ecuador, Eelectric Vehicle, Email & Web Security, Email & Web Security, email security, embedded, embedded devices, Embedded Security, Emerging Markets, Emerging Market Security, EMM, encryption, Endpoint Protection, Endpoint Security, enterprise, enterprise mobility, enterprise resource planning, enterprise scurity, enterprise security, epayment, epo, ePO Deep Command, ePolicy Orchestrator, ERP, ESM, espionage, EV, exploit, exploits, facebook, Facial recongnition, Family Safety, FDCC, file sharing, Financial Security, firewall, FISMA, Fixed Function Devices, Focus, Focus11, FOCUS 2011, forrester, Foundstone, Friday Security Highlights, Garter, Gartner, Gartner Security and Risk Management Summit, George Kurtz, Global Cybersecurity, Global SecurityAlliance Partner Summit, global threat intelligence, google, government, GTI, Hackers, hacking, Hacking Exposed, Hacktivism, HB1140, Healthcare, Heuristics, HIPAA, host intrusion prevention, Host IPS, HV, Hybrid Vehicle, ICS, IDC, identify potential cyber-threats, identity protection, identity theft, IDF 2011, Incident Response, Information leak, Information Protection, Information Security, Information Warfare, Insider Threats, Integrity, Integrity Control, intel, intellectual property, Internet Explorer, internet security, Interop, IntruShield, In vehicle Infotainment, IP, iphone, IPS, IT, IT Security, japan earthquake safe donation, japan earthquake scams, kurtz, labs, laptops, Larry Ponemon, law, legal, legal risk, linkedin, live-tweeting, lizamoon, Lockheed Martin, mac, Mac OS X, malware, Malware research, managed security services, Management, Mariposa, mass sql injection, mastercard, Maturity Model, McAfee, McAfee Application Control, McAfee Cloud Security Platform, McAfee Data Loss Prevention, Mcafee DLP, McAfee Email Gateway 7.0, McAfee Enterprise Mobility Management, McAfee ePO, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee Firewall Enterprise, McAfee FOCUS, McAfee FOCUS 2011, McAfee Identity Protection, McAfee Labs, McAfee Mobile Security, McAfee MOVE AV, McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, McAfee Policy Auditor, McAfee Risk Advisor, McAfee Security Journal, McAfee Security Management, McAfee Security Webinars, McAfee SiteAdvisor, McAfee Vulnerability Manager, McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases, mcafee wavesecure, Microsoft, Microsoft Security Bulletin, Mid-Market, Mobile, mobile antivirus, mobile app, mobile data communications, mobile device, mobile devices, mobile devices and security threats, mobile malware, mobile phone spyware, mobile security, mobile security app, mobile smartphone security, mobiles security, mom, MS12-020, MySQL, NACACS, near field communication, Network Perimeter Security, Network Security, Network Security; Email & Web Security; Security-as-a-Service, network security server security, new year resolution, next-gen IPS, Next Generation IPS, NFC, Night Dragon, NIST, NitroSecurity, OMB, online banking, Open Source, operational risk, Operation Aurora, Optimized, outages, OWASP, passwords, password security, patch, Patch Tuesday, Patmos, PCI, PCI Compliance, PCI DSS, Peer to Peer file sharing, perception, personal information over mobile phones, phishing, PII, Ponemon Institute, PostScript, Potentially unwanted program, power grid, power loss, Pre-detection, Pre-Installed Malware, Printers, privacy, protection, Public-Private partnerships, Public Sector, pup, QR codes, reference architecture, regulations, reporting, reputational risk, retail, risk, Risk Advisor, Risk and Compliance, Risk Management, ROI, Rookits, Rootkits, RSA, RSA 2012, SaaS, SaaS security solutions, safe searching, Saviynt Access Manager, SCADA, scam, SCAP, SEC Guidance, SecTor, secure cloud computing, secure container, security, Security-as-a-Service, Security and Defense Agenda, security attacks, security awareness, security breach, security conferences, Security Connected, Security Connected Reference Architecture, Security Influence, security management, security metrics, security optimization, security policy, security threats, Sentrigo acquisition, Shady RAT, SharePoint, shortened URLs, SIA Partners, SIEM, SiteAdvisor, Situational Awareness, Small Business, smartphones, smartphone security, SMB, social business, social media, social networking, social networks, Software-as-a-Service, spam, Spearphishing, sql attacks, SQL Injection, State of Security, stealth attack, stealth crimeware, stealth detection, Steve Jobs, storage, Stuxnet, Support, Symbian, T-Mobile, Tablet, tablets, tablet security, targeted attacks, TCO, technology development, Telecommunications, threat reduction, TJX, TPM, Trusted Computing Module, trustedsource, twitter, Twitter online security, U.S. Cyber Challenge Camps, urchin.js, Vericept DLP, ViaForensics, Virtualization, VIrtual Machines, visa, Vontu DLP, vPro, vulnerability, Vulnerability Manager, vulnerability manager for databases, Web 2.0, Webinar, web protection, web security, Websense DSS, Web services, white hat hackers, Whitelisting, wikileaks, Windows 7, Windows Mobile, Wind River, Xerox, youtube, Zero-Day, zeus

Security Challenges in the Rapid Adoption of Technology into the Basics of Driving

Monday, January 23, 2012 at 12:27pm by Ryan Permeh
Ryan Permeh

With some predictions of “self driving cars” being available to consumers as early as 2018, the rapid adoption of technology into the basics of driving is posing some interesting challenges from a security standpoint. In a recent TV news report, Closer Look: Newer Cars May Pose Hacking Risk, McAfee’s Brian Contos discusses some of these challenges.

 Electric vehicles (EVs) and Hybrid vehicles (HVs) are using microprocessors to tie data from large, high-speed sensor arrays, to calculate data about everything from charge data and fuel efficiency to tire pressure. Like many modern cars, EVs and HVs have replaced many previously purely mechanical systems with ones that are entirely electronic in nature. Drive by wire, brake-timing and dynamic fuel oxygenation levels are all examples of these advancements.  Some cars can even parallel-park themselves.  This change has granted complex onboard microprocessors an unbelievable amount of control over the general operation of EV and HVs, including several safety critical systems.

 Being green on the road requires being very high-tech under the hood. Manufacturers are in a hurry to show the newest “green” technology, or to show how advancements in “In vehicle Infotainment” systems are bringing new and interesting features to your driving experience.  Auto companies are using real-time cellular internet connections to feed traffic, road conditions and weather to navigation systems, streaming music and entertainment and even allowing remote control of your car.  While there has historically been “remote assistance services” for major lines of autos, there are now mobile phone apps (OnStar RemoteLink and Viper SmartStart iPhone apps) that allow you to control your car directly from your hand.  

A Recent look at work on the data security of some of these individual auto components and the systems themselves has shown that security is not automatically the highest priority for auto manufacturers (Read McAfee’s report: Caution Malware Ahead). While several have begun to make efforts to address current and past problems, the complexity of these systems continues to grow. With the increasing number of these cars showing up on the road, the auto industry may not be prepared for a widespread security issue. While the industry has had its share of “recall” activity, there isn’t a wide ability to patch known bad or infected car systems, or even quickly and easily notify those affected, without causing serious overload on dealerships and potential negative media attention.

 As the auto industry continues to innovate and push new technology deeper into each new car model, it’s equally important the industry consider the security implications of doing so. Proper security design has to happen at the beginning of the process, and needs to be approached in a holistic manner. Modern cars have a variety of technology from several vendors and subcontractors. Each new component offers both a new feature and a potential new threat. Auto companies are increasing the vulnerability of the attack surface by providing technology for easy data access and data sharing, creating a digital landscape behind the driver’s seat. These new attack surfaces need to be paired with effective analysis of threats (Read McAfee’s 2012 Threats Predictions) that can potentially affect such complex and connected systems. Auto companies can then be better prepared to quickly identify and fix those threats to customers.

Bookmark and Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Submit your own comments / message for this post

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments (0)