About Me

Barry McPherson

Barry McPherson
Executive Vice President Worldwide Technical Support and Customer Service

Barry McPherson is ...

Read More

Enterprise Blogs

Feeds & Podcasts

Meet the Bloggers

Archive

Tags

#McAfeeFOCUS, #MFETrivia, #SecChat, #SecurityLegos, 12 Scams of Christmas, 2012, 2012 Security Predictions, Acquisition, Advanced Persistent Threat, Android, android antivirus, Android Malware, Android security, android security app, anti-phishing, anti-theft, anti-virus, antivirus, APIs, App Alert, Apple, application blacklisting, application developers, application security, app protection, apps, app safety, ATM scams, attacks, authentication, automotive, Bad Apps, balanced scorecard, best practices, Big Data, big security data, BlackBerry, Blackhat, Black Hat, black hat hackers, botnet, Brazil, breach, Business IT, car hacking, certification, Change Control, China, CISO Executive Summit, Citrix, class action lawsuit, cloud, Cloud city, Cloud computing, Cloud Expo, cloud security, Cofer Black, collaboration, Compliance, Conficker, consolidation, Consumer, consumerization, consumerization of IT, Content Protection, counter identity theft, credit card fraud and protection, credit card skimming, critical infrastructure, CSP, cyber attack, Cybercrime, cyberespionage, Cyber Insurance, Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011, cyber security, cybersecurity, cyber security awareness, Cyber Security Mom, cyber threat, cyberthreats, data, database activity monitoring, database security, data breach, Datacenter, data center, data center security, Data Classification, data loss, Data Loss Prevention, Data Protection, Data Protection Act, Dave DeWalt, Dave Marcus, dedicated security appliances, Deep Command, Deep Defender, DeepSAFE, DefCon, DefCon Kids, Department of Commerce, device, Device Control, devices, dewalt, DLP, Dmitri Alperovitch, easter, Ecuador, Eelectric Vehicle, Email & Web Security, Email & Web Security, email security, embedded, embedded devices, Embedded Security, Emerging Markets, Emerging Market Security, EMM, encryption, Endpoint Protection, Endpoint Security, enterprise, enterprise mobility, enterprise resource planning, enterprise scurity, enterprise security, epayment, epo, ePO Deep Command, ePolicy Orchestrator, ERP, ESM, espionage, EV, exploit, exploits, facebook, Facial recongnition, Family Safety, FDCC, file sharing, Financial Security, firewall, FISMA, Fixed Function Devices, Focus, Focus11, FOCUS 2011, forrester, Foundstone, Friday Security Highlights, Garter, Gartner, Gartner Security and Risk Management Summit, George Kurtz, Global Cybersecurity, Global SecurityAlliance Partner Summit, global threat intelligence, google, government, GTI, Hackers, hacking, Hacking Exposed, Hacktivism, HB1140, Healthcare, Heuristics, HIPAA, host intrusion prevention, Host IPS, HV, Hybrid Vehicle, ICS, IDC, identify potential cyber-threats, identity protection, identity theft, IDF 2011, Incident Response, Information leak, Information Protection, Information Security, Information Warfare, Insider Threats, Integrity, Integrity Control, intel, intellectual property, Internet Explorer, internet security, Interop, IntruShield, In vehicle Infotainment, IP, iphone, IPS, IT, IT Security, japan earthquake safe donation, japan earthquake scams, kurtz, labs, laptops, Larry Ponemon, law, legal, legal risk, linkedin, live-tweeting, lizamoon, Lockheed Martin, mac, Mac OS X, malware, Malware research, managed security services, Management, Mariposa, mass sql injection, mastercard, Maturity Model, McAfee, McAfee Application Control, McAfee Cloud Security Platform, McAfee Data Loss Prevention, Mcafee DLP, McAfee Email Gateway 7.0, McAfee Enterprise Mobility Management, McAfee ePO, McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator, McAfee Firewall Enterprise, McAfee FOCUS, McAfee FOCUS 2011, McAfee Identity Protection, McAfee Labs, McAfee Mobile Security, McAfee MOVE AV, McAfee Network Security Platform, McAfee NSP, McAfee Policy Auditor, McAfee Risk Advisor, McAfee Security Journal, McAfee Security Management, McAfee Security Webinars, McAfee SiteAdvisor, McAfee Vulnerability Manager, McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases, mcafee wavesecure, Microsoft, Microsoft Security Bulletin, Mid-Market, Mobile, mobile antivirus, mobile app, mobile data communications, mobile device, mobile devices, mobile devices and security threats, mobile malware, mobile phone spyware, mobile security, mobile security app, mobile smartphone security, mobiles security, mom, MS12-020, MySQL, NACACS, near field communication, Network Perimeter Security, Network Security, Network Security; Email & Web Security; Security-as-a-Service, network security server security, new year resolution, next-gen IPS, Next Generation IPS, NFC, Night Dragon, NIST, NitroSecurity, NitroView, OMB, online banking, Open Source, operational risk, Operation Aurora, Optimized, outages, OWASP, passwords, password security, patch, Patch Tuesday, Patmos, PCI, PCI Compliance, PCI DSS, Peer to Peer file sharing, perception, personal information over mobile phones, phishing, PII, Ponemon Institute, PostScript, Potentially unwanted program, power grid, power loss, Pre-detection, Pre-Installed Malware, Printers, privacy, protection, Public-Private partnerships, Public Sector, pup, QR codes, reference architecture, regulations, reporting, reputational risk, retail, risk, Risk Advisor, Risk and Compliance, Risk Management, ROI, Rookits, Rootkits, RSA, RSA 2012, SaaS, SaaS security solutions, safe searching, Saviynt Access Manager, SCADA, scam, SCAP, SEC Guidance, SecTor, secure cloud computing, secure container, security, Security-as-a-Service, Security and Defense Agenda, security attacks, security awareness, security breach, security conferences, Security Connected, Security Connected Reference Architecture, Security Influence, security information and event management, security management, security metrics, security optimization, security policy, security threats, Sentrigo acquisition, Shady RAT, SharePoint, shortened URLs, SIA Partners, SIEM, SiteAdvisor, Situational Awareness, Small Business, smartphones, smartphone security, SMB, social business, social media, social networking, social networks, Software-as-a-Service, spam, Spearphishing, sql attacks, SQL Injection, State of Security, stealth attack, stealth crimeware, stealth detection, Steve Jobs, storage, Stuxnet, Support, Symbian, T-Mobile, Tablet, tablets, tablet security, targeted attacks, TCO, technology development, Telecommunications, threat reduction, TJX, TPM, Trusted Computing Module, trustedsource, twitter, Twitter online security, U.S. Cyber Challenge Camps, urchin.js, Vericept DLP, ViaForensics, Virtualization, VIrtual Machines, visa, Vontu DLP, vPro, vulnerability, Vulnerability Manager, vulnerability manager for databases, Web 2.0, Webinar, web protection, web security, Websense DSS, Web services, white hat hackers, Whitelisting, wikileaks, Windows 7, Windows Mobile, Wind River, Xerox, youtube, Zero-Day, zeus

A Long Day at McAfee

Wednesday, April 21, 2010 at 11:14pm by Barry McPherson
Barry McPherson

As I approach my 14th straight hour on the phone with my worldwide support team, and a number of them logging a similar number of hours, I can assure you that we are still working because I and the rest of the McAfee team are taking the issues raised in your comments to my previous blog, in our support forums, on the phone with us and elsewhere very seriously.

In our ongoing efforts to protect our customers from a seemingly endlessly multiplying variety and volume of attacks, today we released a update file that clearly did more harm than good. There was a legitimate threat and we wanted to protect our customers, as we have done successfully thousands and thousands of times before. But in trying to do so, we created negative and unintended consequences for some very important people. Many of you.

Having talked to literally hundreds of my colleagues around the world and emailed thousands to try and find the best way to correct these issues, let me say this has not been my favorite day. Not for me, or for McAfee. Not by a long shot.

Mistakes happen. No excuses. The nearly 7,000 employees of McAfee are focused right now on two things, in this order. First, help our customers who have been affected by this issue get back to business as usual. And second, once that is done, make sure we put the processes in place so this never happens again.

If you are a enterprise/corporate account, and you have an issue these entries in our virus information library and the knowledge base provide workarounds for this issue. If you are a consumer and have an issue, this support page provides information for impacted consumers or call +1 866 622 3911. We have teams of people standing by to help. (To contact McAfee by phone in your region, go to the “Contact Us” page on our Web site and select your country for the correct number.)

I also recommend customers sign up for our Support Notification Service to get real critical product information via e-mail. Go to the SNS Subscription Preference Center to subscribe. For more information, view the SNS KnowledgeBase article and FAQ.

Barry

Bookmark and Share

Tags: ,

Submit your own comments / message for this post

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments (331)

  • James April 25, 2010 5:30PM

    A blog post said, “Don’t blame Mcafee.” Don’t blame Mcafee? I was down three days and way behind in my work. Up and running but still not working right at day five. And you’re making excuses for Mcafee? Well, Mcafee provides a service they claim the best, yet guess that’s now open to question. I’ve been twice to their support line, waiting over an hour both times, then having difficulty communicating with the techs. They don’t speak English very well. The first call got my computer up and running at day three after 3-hours on the phone — until I shut down for the evening. When I restarted the hard drive acted odd, blank screen, loaded slow, the mcafee splash took over five minutes to show on the screen, now it doesn’t always show at all, can’t perform a DOS superDat scan at the safe mode dos prompt, says illegal operation and screen loads with strange characters; easy network won’t load, the Virtual Tech program won’t load claiming I have to first reboot my computer to install a new update. And my ‘D’ drive acts damaged – recognized at start-up then drops off the board — I have years of files on that drive, backup is old, tried to back it up, but won’t do it. Although back on the net, seems ok there, the computer itself is still much slower to load at startup than before and all the other issues I mentioned. But they are trying to tell me I’m 100% protected so no problem. 100% PROTECTED FROM WHAT? Not the damage they have done to my computer, and not the time it has cost me trying to get it working as before. Do I now have to write the major press networks across this country until someone at Mcafee gets the clue that I’m not happy until they’ve restored my computer back up and running like before?

  • Bryan April 25, 2010 1:55PM

    We will now be removing your software from our computers. You have lost our trust. say goodbye to 700 laptops!

    • Elsy March 8, 2012 7:21AM

      Since mobile nphoes of today can browse the internet, it is necessary to have a mobile antivirus installed on the phone to combat viruses, spyware and other internet attacks, keeping your identity and data safe from hackers and thieves.

  • Mke a. April 25, 2010 9:00AM

    My PC continually reboots. When given the choice of safe modes, start normally, etc., no matter the choce selected the machine reboots again. I can find no solution online and have caled McAfee support # and have been on hold 3 different times for more than an 1-1/2 hours each time and not gotten through. McAfee is supplied through my ATT/Yahoo DSL service. No help from them either. Thank goodness for a laptop with Trend Micro.

  • Kyle April 24, 2010 10:22PM

    Is this an apology or a defiant excuse? I’m a design engineer at Intel regularly working 70-hour-week, and you are touting 14th hour “long-day” by you and some of your employees in this crisis you created?? There were thousands computers at my campus alone that were paralyzed for half day and beyond. What a “long-day” you created for your customers? Should I thank McAfee for giving me a rare break? No. Because of this mess I had to sleep even fewer hours to make it up, and skipped Wednesday’s lunch to manually fix 6 computers for myself and co-workers. You get paid to defend PCs against virus, not to behave like a virus. Yes, mistakes do happen, but your blog and your corporate response are insults to customers who paid you and entrusted you. That showed what kind of arrogant culture McAfee has. I hope some of your corporate customers will dump you because of this. And I’ll not buy any McAfee product for personal use.

  • Ken K April 24, 2010 8:24PM

    Says the McAfee web site: “Because we value our loyal customers, if your PC was rendered inoperable or severely impaired as a result of the faulty file released you are eligible for a two year extension of your existing McAfee subscription free of charge.”

    Wow! Two more years of McAfee! My recommendation: Get your security protection software changed ASAP! Too bad. They’ve been good in the past. But this one “Oh Sh*%” will put McAfee out of business or filing for bankruptcy within a year or two.

    • Miranda March 8, 2012 9:43AM

      I simply watend to type a simple note to be able to say thanks to you for those superb guides you are posting here. My prolonged internet investigation has at the end been honored with brilliant facts to exchange with my best friends. I would declare that most of us site visitors actually are unquestionably lucky to exist in a fine network with so many perfect professionals with useful suggestions. I feel truly lucky to have used your website and look forward to tons of more cool times reading here. Thank you once more for all the details.

  • Peterk April 24, 2010 6:28PM

    “Why didn’t McAfee send a notice to its subscribers? You have our emails for billing purposes and know which products we use.”

    er-uh if if you don’t have internet access and your computer is toast what the good is a notice from the vendor going to do?

  • David April 24, 2010 4:56PM

    This stuff you call a protection “product” ins’t supposed to take down systems, let alone companies. This dribble you are peddeling brought down a fortune 500 companay for hours.

    I trusted McAfee bucause my Hi-Tech employer did. No longer. I am NOT renewing my personal subscription.

  • MADMAx April 24, 2010 1:01PM

    HEY JT
    and anyone else who thinks that you or I as a customer need to check the quality of an update!
    That is like me getting a car fixed, then before taking the car out of the parking lot, make sure the repairs were done, asking the same mechanic to check it that fixed it.
    I subscribe to an AV solution, giving them my confidence and paying them to make sure this kind of thing does not happen. I don’t care what kind of excuse they would give me, quality control should be a pretty high priority, especially crashing a whole row of computers, that is pretty unacceptable. I support more than 200 users, vastly using XP SP3. I don’t have the time or manpower, do it all myself, to check every piece of software, every update, everything that runs through my network. WHY SHOULD I HAVE TO CHECK EVERY LITTLE DETAIL? that is what i am paying the company to do, the ones that are putting out the AV updates! If my current AV solution started going this route, i would hose them and find something different. THINK TOYOTA!!

    I think admitting to the mistake and also giving people a refund would greatly help the IMAGE of McAfee. People don’t want to hear how hard or long McAfee technicians are working, nor speak to their incompetent technicians. They want to hear: “We are very sorry this happened, we would like to help you get back to work, or pleasure, we will refund you for expenses incurred and make sure it WILL NOT and CANNOT and WON’T EVER EVER EVER HAPPEN AGAIN.”

    I have used various AVs and they all have their flaws, symantecs heavy system resource usage, AVG network edition not detecting viruses that have been out since 2006, having to renew a Avira subscription every six months, etc etc. This one is definitely the one that has taken first prize in failures. Imagine you are the reason for the failure of hospitals, banks, businesses, government agencies, websites, airlines, trains, you name it, its been shutdown. This is not a virus, but, like someone said, an ANTIVIRUS COMPANY.
    Can’t even eat at my favorite restaurant because their credit card machine is linked to the cash register, which uses McAfees AV.

  • Eric Irvin April 24, 2010 10:42AM

    Is this representative of the layoffs and budget cuts McAfee has been making over the previous few months?

  • Hermann Wilhelmer April 24, 2010 4:38AM

    I am from Austria with 3 machines running Vista Business, one with Vista Ultimate and one with XP. The machines running Vista Business ran into deep troubles after having installed McAfee updates two days ago with IE8 breaking down completely. Though I checked McAfee homepage in German and English I got no clue on what was going on. By chance I read an article on McAfee´s big problems worldwide in an Austrian daily paper today and was able to fix my Vista Notebooks an hour ago. Mind: It cost me two days to find out!! So McAfee: Please dont give me empty PR talk´! I simply hate it!

  • Reis308 April 24, 2010 4:26AM

    Just how in the HELL are we to aply a fix to a computer that endlessly Re-BOOTS? DUH? Fortunately I had a NORTON Save and Restore Copy of my C and E drives and restored EVERYTHING B4 your Update. I’m switching to the Norton/Symanted product and Dumping yours.

    • Khing March 8, 2012 7:31AM

      I and also my pals were found to be looking rgtouhh the great pointers found on the blog while the sudden got a terrible suspicion I never expressed respect to the site owner for them. The boys are already so glad to learn all of them and have in effect simply been tapping into these things. Many thanks for being very kind and then for finding these kinds of important topics millions of individuals are really desperate to learn about. Our sincere apologies for not expressing appreciation to you sooner.

  • DeepPurple April 23, 2010 10:40PM

    After two days, there is still no clear communication about this huge problem on McAfee website. And why don t you write to all your customers to apologize and to give them the solution (which is rather easy to implement) ? I was ready to reinstall my computer from scratch, losing all my data, when I have fortunately seen information about the McAfee problem on a computer magazine site. To make a mistake is always possible, but not communicating with your customers about it is unforgivable.

  • Chris April 23, 2010 9:44PM

    Boy, now I’m glad Comcast quit supporting McAfee and switched me to Norton last week!

  • Canuk April 23, 2010 8:17PM

    having to take down our entire company to avoid a “virus” was bad. having to wait until the following day for a fix was worse. Our 2 engineers figured out the problem in 3 hours and made their own fix, which works better than the mcafee (and arrived 12 hours earlier).

    I take issue with a number of items. The first is this idea that a small percentage were affected. On ALL WinXP SP3 machines, this destroyed them. 100%. We avoided by shutting down for hours!

    The second is that due diligence and testing were done, and this slipped by. How much is Microsoft paying you to try and force users to purchase Windows7? I hope it will recover the costs of all your XP customers defecting, because apparently you dont have a *single* XP machine fully patched to current release from microsoft!!! A single one! Thats comforting…

    So – you might as well fire your whole testing and qa team – they arent helping. Maybe outsource it to a software company. I hear microsoft can do it, just not on windows XP.

  • ResponseIT April 23, 2010 3:23PM

    http://www.response-it.co.uk/blog/news/mcafee-update-problem-deletion-of-svchost-exe-no-windows-xp-taskbar

    You can see our fix here , what I would like know is about reimbursement for our customers who have had to engineers to each of their sites? I would least expect a refund of their existing product so they can move to something more reliable!

  • John R. April 23, 2010 2:12PM

    I’m from Italy, I had only 1 critical computer in my office hit by this “issue”, but it took nearly all day to realize what was happening, and only because a news post flashed for a few minutes in google news: probably you already guessed that it was the only pc running McAfee and that it was promptly uninstalled afterwards. I agree with the folks saying that it was not a mistake, but a major negligence letting this update out. I won’t surely suggest it to anyone seeking my advice.
    Thanks McAfee for wasting my time (and money).

    • Hanyfa March 8, 2012 8:04AM

      Dont agree that it supports a wide atviery of video formats. More than half of my mkvs dont play well on this and theres lots of films where for some reason or another it cant read the subtitles. Big mistake buying this one, should have bought a second eGreat instead.When it does read the subtitles they are miserably small and I havent found any way of changing their size. DTS files have no sound (the eGreat just downmixes them to stereo) and theres no way to move a specific point on a file.

  • Enkidu April 23, 2010 2:03PM

    Linux. Really.

  • Jon April 23, 2010 1:00PM

    Yes, mistakes happen but the company’s response has been miserable. I contacted the technical support group, was transferred to another who gave me a toll-free number to call which turned out to be disconnected. Another call reuslted in a half hour call with someone who had no idea what to do (how many times do I tell you I can’t boot my machine!)and he said he would send me a link to connect with an on-line technician. 24 hours later. No link.

  • Jennifer Ross April 23, 2010 12:42PM

    I think it is very disappointing that McAfee made no effort to communicate with its clients about the problem. Additionally, the website still has not posted anything prominently about the issue. Having a small link about a false positive is not as clear as saying “Attention XP Users: DAT file may be disrupting your operating system.”

    Why didn’t McAfee send a notice to its subscribers? You have our emails for billing purposes and know which products we use. Since I didn’t learn about the true cause of the issue until CNET (not McAfee) announced this Thursday afternoon, I wasted most of Wednesday afternoon and Thursday morning attempting my own fixes based on symptoms. Then I needed to spend Thursday afternoon and this morning, fixing the computer again because my “fixes” created new issues.

    Had McAfee sent an email with the link to the fix, I could have spent less than 30 minutes, instead of approximately 10 hours trying to fix one of our older workstations.

    How will McAfee be easing the pain of its customers?

  • Charlie April 23, 2010 12:09PM

    Wheew, I sure am glad I stopped using McAfee years ago. I am REALLY sorry that my federal agency stil uses this product. I oversee support for over 5,000 desktops for a major HHS OpDiv and I have never seen an entire agency grind to a halt like what happened Wednesday and Thursday. We had to touch over 5,000 machines in 24 hours while untold amounts of US Taxpayers dollars just got flushed down the toilet.

    Way to go McAfee. As for me, I’ll stick to AVG.