<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MS Word Zero-Day Trio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/2006/12/14/ms-word-zero-day-trio/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/ms-word-zero-day-trio</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:25:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/ms-word-zero-day-trio/comment-page-1#comment-6908</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=155#comment-6908</guid>
		<description>OpenOffice 2.1 also is vulnerable to Word III</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OpenOffice 2.1 also is vulnerable to Word III</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/ms-word-zero-day-trio/comment-page-1#comment-6907</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=155#comment-6907</guid>
		<description>Do you have anti-virus detection signatures available for all three avenues of attack exploiting these vulnerabilities ?

Do they only detect the proof-of-concept or also possible variants ?

What is the latest required VirusScan DAT file to stay protected from this trio ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have anti-virus detection signatures available for all three avenues of attack exploiting these vulnerabilities ?</p>
<p>Do they only detect the proof-of-concept or also possible variants ?</p>
<p>What is the latest required VirusScan DAT file to stay protected from this trio ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Howard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/ms-word-zero-day-trio/comment-page-1#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 20:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=155#comment-6906</guid>
		<description>Do the McAfee patterns that detect these three threats provide heuristic detection? I am particularly interested protection against email borne threats.

Cheers,
si</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the McAfee patterns that detect these three threats provide heuristic detection? I am particularly interested protection against email borne threats.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
si</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

