<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Image Spam Part 1 &#8211; Explosion in 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/2007/01/12/image-spam-part-1-explosion-in-2006/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/image-spam-part-1-explosion-in-2006</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 07:51:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Spam Info</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/image-spam-part-1-explosion-in-2006/comment-page-1#comment-7180</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Spam Info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 10:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=170#comment-7180</guid>
		<description>I must say that a great analysis have been done in terms of the number of stocks being spammed. I am myself have been looking for some relavent and useful articles regarding spamming. One of the web page that i certainly found worthful to be shared is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.anti-spam-info.com&quot; title=&quot;Spam Filtering&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spam-Filtering, Comment Spam, Anti-Spam, Anti-Spam Solutions&lt;/a&gt; Website</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say that a great analysis have been done in terms of the number of stocks being spammed. I am myself have been looking for some relavent and useful articles regarding spamming. One of the web page that i certainly found worthful to be shared is <a href="http://www.anti-spam-info.com" title="Spam Filtering" rel="nofollow">Spam-Filtering, Comment Spam, Anti-Spam, Anti-Spam Solutions</a> Website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/image-spam-part-1-explosion-in-2006/comment-page-1#comment-7178</link>
		<dc:creator>Bla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 10:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=170#comment-7178</guid>
		<description>What exactly are the efforts of McAfee on detecting image spam? I cannot confirm the 99+%
The analysis is quite complex, as image spam never drops in for a second time. If one image spam is not recognized, you will sure adapt your ruels and filters and after a couple of hours THAT one would have been rejected now... however, it would not come again.

Bla</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly are the efforts of McAfee on detecting image spam? I cannot confirm the 99+%<br />
The analysis is quite complex, as image spam never drops in for a second time. If one image spam is not recognized, you will sure adapt your ruels and filters and after a couple of hours THAT one would have been rejected now&#8230; however, it would not come again.</p>
<p>Bla</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natraj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/image-spam-part-1-explosion-in-2006/comment-page-1#comment-7177</link>
		<dc:creator>Natraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=170#comment-7177</guid>
		<description>Thank you for keeping us informed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for keeping us informed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

