<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Zero Day Threats: Part 3 &#8211; When &amp; How Are They Released?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/2007/06/26/zero-day-threats-part-3-when-how-are-they-released/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/zero-day-threats-part-3-when-how-are-they-released</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:34:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justine Aitel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/zero-day-threats-part-3-when-how-are-they-released/comment-page-1#comment-10620</link>
		<dc:creator>Justine Aitel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 20:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.mcafee.com/2007/06/26/zero-day-threats-part-3-when-how-are-they-released/#comment-10620</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this. The industry-wide increase in the discussion of 0day is a good thing. Not everyone is in agreement on everything (for example Immunity focuses on and defines 0day itself, rather than the 0day threat), however the increased discussion is going to help people understand threats &amp; protect themselves. Immunity took 0day&#039;s public in 2002 when the company was founded. The public response, general understanding and acceptance of 0day at that time demonstrated a real misunderstanding of the existence and threat of 0day. Subsequent establishment/success of the programs such as those listed in Part 2 are both a reflection of and influence over today&#039;s rapidly changing security landscape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this. The industry-wide increase in the discussion of 0day is a good thing. Not everyone is in agreement on everything (for example Immunity focuses on and defines 0day itself, rather than the 0day threat), however the increased discussion is going to help people understand threats &amp; protect themselves. Immunity took 0day&#8217;s public in 2002 when the company was founded. The public response, general understanding and acceptance of 0day at that time demonstrated a real misunderstanding of the existence and threat of 0day. Subsequent establishment/success of the programs such as those listed in Part 2 are both a reflection of and influence over today&#8217;s rapidly changing security landscape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

