<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Perils Of Leaving Wi-Fi Networks Unsecured</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/2008/09/15/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 04:55:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eve isk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/comment-page-1#comment-184963</link>
		<dc:creator>eve isk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=716#comment-184963</guid>
		<description>This is tough. Im not saying you are responsible, I think it is everyone else out there that isnt taking notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is tough. Im not saying you are responsible, I think it is everyone else out there that isnt taking notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bzane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/comment-page-1#comment-18870</link>
		<dc:creator>bzane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 01:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=716#comment-18870</guid>
		<description>Legal, UnFettered access is EVERYWHERE, and GROWING
-------------------------- Jan 2009 -----------------------------------------
Aw, come on ! ! !
    Download child pornography
    Download copyrighted movies and music via P2P
    Download Warez and abuse your bandwidth
    Send bomb hoaxes, terror or threatening emails.
    Send spam (sexual aids, pharmacy or money laundering scams)

Are you for real ?
Most big cities, most towns, motels and coffee shops have, and encourage your unfettered use of their FREE  access.
-
Most SUPERIOR COURTHOUSES in California provide open  on-premises access.  I&#039;ll bet your state is the same.
--
Check out the emerging Google/San_Francisco partnership.
      This will be *full* coverage.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/08/BUGROI5S5J1.DTL
---
I want fiber speeds via wireless for FREE.   Don&#039;t You.
Come on,   don&#039;t lie to me or yourself.
---------------------------
I mean if you own a bank, drug store or employment agency, OK . . .turn on WEP/WAP/anything.     But *knock off*  the B.S. scare tactics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal, UnFettered access is EVERYWHERE, and GROWING<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Jan 2009 &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Aw, come on ! ! !<br />
    Download child pornography<br />
    Download copyrighted movies and music via P2P<br />
    Download Warez and abuse your bandwidth<br />
    Send bomb hoaxes, terror or threatening emails.<br />
    Send spam (sexual aids, pharmacy or money laundering scams)</p>
<p>Are you for real ?<br />
Most big cities, most towns, motels and coffee shops have, and encourage your unfettered use of their FREE  access.<br />
-<br />
Most SUPERIOR COURTHOUSES in California provide open  on-premises access.  I&#8217;ll bet your state is the same.<br />
&#8211;<br />
Check out the emerging Google/San_Francisco partnership.<br />
      This will be *full* coverage.<br />
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/08/BUGROI5S5J1.DTL<br />
&#8212;<br />
I want fiber speeds via wireless for FREE.   Don&#8217;t You.<br />
Come on,   don&#8217;t lie to me or yourself.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
I mean if you own a bank, drug store or employment agency, OK . . .turn on WEP/WAP/anything.     But *knock off*  the B.S. scare tactics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdubh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/comment-page-1#comment-18869</link>
		<dc:creator>mdubh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 14:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=716#comment-18869</guid>
		<description>Good point about the logs being flushed on reboot.  Anyone choosing to offer open Wifi should be running a syslog server, which many SOHO routers support, as well as securing the admin account with a strong password.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the logs being flushed on reboot.  Anyone choosing to offer open Wifi should be running a syslog server, which many SOHO routers support, as well as securing the admin account with a strong password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaushik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/comment-page-1#comment-18867</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaushik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=716#comment-18867</guid>
		<description>India is considering making unsecured wireless networks illegal:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/151171/india_wants_to_secure_wifi_hotspots_citing_terror_threat.html

It&#039;s all too easy to make proclamations like this, but it&#039;s extremely unlikely that this will lead to increased security and accountability unless implemented very, very well. For example, I&#039;m sure most people and even law enforcement personnel are unaware of how vulnerable WEP is, yet this is what most people use even today. Will the proposed law mandate the use of WAP2 instead of WEP? Unlikely.

Secondly, even if (and I mean IF) all wireless networks in the country were secured with WAP2, what is to stop terrorists from walking into an Internet Browsing Cafe (there&#039;s one on every street corner in Indian cities)? Order all Internet Cafe owners to verify ids of all their customers? Couldn&#039;t possibly work.

Even IF this is all done, terrorists can just use the free wireless networks provided by airports and coffee shops.

There are just too many holes to plug in securing public internet access. This money and time would be better spent funding Intelligence organizations to do real anti-terror operations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India is considering making unsecured wireless networks illegal:<br />
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/151171/india_wants_to_secure_wifi_hotspots_citing_terror_threat.html</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all too easy to make proclamations like this, but it&#8217;s extremely unlikely that this will lead to increased security and accountability unless implemented very, very well. For example, I&#8217;m sure most people and even law enforcement personnel are unaware of how vulnerable WEP is, yet this is what most people use even today. Will the proposed law mandate the use of WAP2 instead of WEP? Unlikely.</p>
<p>Secondly, even if (and I mean IF) all wireless networks in the country were secured with WAP2, what is to stop terrorists from walking into an Internet Browsing Cafe (there&#8217;s one on every street corner in Indian cities)? Order all Internet Cafe owners to verify ids of all their customers? Couldn&#8217;t possibly work.</p>
<p>Even IF this is all done, terrorists can just use the free wireless networks provided by airports and coffee shops.</p>
<p>There are just too many holes to plug in securing public internet access. This money and time would be better spent funding Intelligence organizations to do real anti-terror operations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JASON</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/comment-page-1#comment-18865</link>
		<dc:creator>JASON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 20:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=716#comment-18865</guid>
		<description>When the fbi raids their house then they will care about wifi security

LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the fbi raids their house then they will care about wifi security</p>
<p>LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Wollenweber</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/comment-page-1#comment-18862</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Wollenweber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=716#comment-18862</guid>
		<description>You bring up very valid points with regards to what a malicious attacker might do with an open wireless AP. All of those things should be taken into consideration by someone that consciously makes such as choice. Most importantly, I think users should be aware that their data is at risk by opening an AP. However, I&#039;d make two points. First, wireless security sucks. WEP is trivial to break and WPA/WPA2 can usually broken fairly easily. Brad Anton. at Foundstone wrote up lots of nice attacks. So, &quot;securing&quot; your wifi appropriately is difficult for most home users. Second, law enforcement and the MPAA shouldn&#039;t rely on IP addresses to establish who committed a crime (such as downloading child porn). Trying to reinforce that assumption is bad in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up very valid points with regards to what a malicious attacker might do with an open wireless AP. All of those things should be taken into consideration by someone that consciously makes such as choice. Most importantly, I think users should be aware that their data is at risk by opening an AP. However, I&#8217;d make two points. First, wireless security sucks. WEP is trivial to break and WPA/WPA2 can usually broken fairly easily. Brad Anton. at Foundstone wrote up lots of nice attacks. So, &#8220;securing&#8221; your wifi appropriately is difficult for most home users. Second, law enforcement and the MPAA shouldn&#8217;t rely on IP addresses to establish who committed a crime (such as downloading child porn). Trying to reinforce that assumption is bad in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.mcafee.com/mcafee-labs/the-perils-of-leaving-wi-fi-networks-unsecured/comment-page-1#comment-18861</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.labs.com/research/blog/?p=716#comment-18861</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to use this article to scare the shit out of our customers!!!   I work for an ISP abuse department, and can&#039;t tell you how many people have unsecured Wi-Fi&#039;s.  Thanks for a great article!!!

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to use this article to scare the shit out of our customers!!!   I work for an ISP abuse department, and can&#8217;t tell you how many people have unsecured Wi-Fi&#8217;s.  Thanks for a great article!!!</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

