About Me

Nick Kelly

Nick Kelly

Read More

Feeds & Podcasts

Blogs

Meet the Bloggers

Archive

Tags

#SecChat $1 million guarantee 12 Scams of Christmas access to live fraud resolution agents Acquisition Alex Thurber Android antivirus Apple botnet Channel Partners cloud security Compliance Consumer counter identity theft credit card fraud and protection credit fraud alerts credit monitoring credit monitoring and resolution critical infrastructure Cyber Security Mom cyberbullying Cybercrime cybermom data breach data center data center security Data Protection Dave DeWalt DLP Email & Web Security embedded encryption Endpoint Protection enterprise facebook fake anti-virus software Family Safety Friday Security Highlights global threat intelligence google government Hacktivism how to talk to kids how to talk to teens identity fraud identity fraud scams identity protection identity protection $1 million guarantee identity protection fraud identity protection surveillance identity surveillance identity theft identity theft expert identity theft fraud identity theft protection identity theft protection product Identity thieves and cybercriminals intel iphone kids online behavior lost wallet protection malware McAfee McAfee Channel McAfee Family Protection McAfee Identity Protection McAfee Initiative to Fight Cybercrime McAfee Labs McAfee security products Mid-Market Mobile mobile malware mobile security monitor credit and personal information Network Security online personal data protection online safety Operation Aurora PCI personal identity theft fraud personal information loss personal information protection phishing privacy proactive identity protection proactive identity surveillance Public Sector restore credit and personal identity Risk and Compliance scam scams scareware security smartphones social media social networking social networks spam Stuxnet twitter vulnerability Web 2.0 work with victim restore identity

Are Spammers Giving Up on Image Spam?

Friday, May 25, 2007 at 10:38am by Nick Kelly
Nick Kelly

McAfee Avert Labs has just published my white paper on “Image Spam: The New Email Scourge.” You have your choice of seven languages, and you can find the English version here.

Since that paper was written, we’ve seen a marked change in recent image spam stats, so I thought I’d give you an update. Following a large increase in 2006, image spam remained steady during the first quarter of 2007 and accounted for up to 60 percent of all spam. During the last few weeks, however, there has been a significant reduction in spam that contains embedded images, dropping from 59 percent at the start of April to 12 percent earlier this week.

For the last year and a half image spam has typically contained embedded .GIF, .JPG, or .PNG images. Spammers, particularly German “pump and dump” stock spammers, are now uploading the spam images to free image-hosting and photography sites such as imageshack.us and imagehosting.com and are linking to those images in their spam rather than including the pictures in the email.

Another recent trend is spammers posting spam images onto compromised Web servers and then linking to the image in their spam.

The amount of hosted image spam does not currently make up for the reduction in embedded image spam, but it is increasing in the same way that previous image spam has, as more spammers jump on this bandwagon.

During the last 24 hours embedded image spam has again increased to 31 percent of spam, so whether the pump-and-dump spammers were having a holiday during April and are now back at work, or if this is a temporary increase, remains to be seen. The chart below shows the amount of spam containing embedded images since September last year.

Image Spam volume

Bookmark and Share

Submit your own comments / message for this post

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

 

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments (0)