#SecChat $1 million guarantee 12 Scams of Christmas access to live fraud resolution agents Acquisition Alex Thurber Android antivirus Apple botnet Channel Partners cloud security Compliance Consumer counter identity theft credit card fraud and protection credit fraud alerts credit monitoring credit monitoring and resolution critical infrastructure Cyber Security Mom cyberbullying Cybercrime cybermom data breach data center data center security Data Protection Dave DeWalt DLP Email & Web Security embedded encryption Endpoint Protection enterprise facebook fake anti-virus software Family Safety Friday Security Highlights global threat intelligence google government Hacktivism how to talk to kids how to talk to teens identity fraud identity fraud scams identity protection identity protection $1 million guarantee identity protection fraud identity protection surveillance identity surveillance identity theft identity theft expert identity theft fraud identity theft protection identity theft protection product Identity thieves and cybercriminals intel iphone kids online behavior lost wallet protection malware McAfee McAfee Channel McAfee Family Protection McAfee Identity Protection McAfee Initiative to Fight Cybercrime McAfee Labs McAfee security products Mid-Market Mobile mobile malware mobile security monitor credit and personal information Network Security online personal data protection online safety Operation Aurora PCI personal identity theft fraud personal information loss personal information protection phishing privacy proactive identity protection proactive identity surveillance Public Sector restore credit and personal identity Risk and Compliance scam scams scareware security smartphones social media social networking social networks spam Stuxnet twitter vulnerability Web 2.0 work with victim restore identity
|
|
Malware authors have been at the cutting edge of incorporating exploit code into their creations for zero day vulnerabilities. Fueled by financial incentives and readily available source code, the bad guys of today aggressively pursue continued development of malware code. Over the years, the window between vulnerability discoveries to its incorporation into a worm or exploit candidate has shrunk from months, to weeks, to zero day. This leaves administrators with very little time to schedule and deploy patches to all servers and workstations on their networks. And during this vulnerable time frame if the network is hit with a bot that uses a zero-day vulnerability, an organization could be faced with a potential worm outbreak or large scale attack.
The chart below shows the time frame between the vulnerability being reported and how long it took for malware authors to incorporate it into a worm candidate.
|
Patch |
Malware |
Patch Availability |
Worm Attack Date |
Number of days for worm to appear |
|
MS01-020 |
Nimda |
Oct 17th, 2000 |
Sept18th, 2001 |
335 Days |
|
MS02-061 |
Slammer |
July 24th, 2002 |
Jan 25th, 2003 |
185 Days |
|
MS03-026 |
Blaster |
July 16th, 2003 |
Aug 11th, 2003 |
26 Days |
|
MS04-011 |
Sasser |
Apr 13th, 2004 |
Apr 30th, 2004 |
17 Days |
|
MS05-039 |
Zotob |
Aug 09th, 2005 |
Aug 14th, 2005 |
5 Days |
|
MS06-040 |
Mocbot |
Aug 08th, 2006 |
Aug 12th 2006 |
4 Days |
The paper “Defeating bots on the internal network” from McAfee Avert Labs published in the Feb 2007 issue of Virus Bulletin describes setting up an IRC honeypot on a network using minimal resources and requiring little maintenance to be used as an early warning system to proactively alert botnet activity. Also discussed is using the internal IRC honeypot to gain control over infected machines and removing the bot from infected machines.
|
|
Submit your own comments / message for this post