With a Russian Gang
|
|
The recent WikiLeaks disclosure of more than 250,000 U.S. State Department diplomatic cables got people worked up. Running opposite much public opinion, the main WikiLeaks defender in the hacktivism field is the “Anonymous” group.
After earlier engaging in various cyberdemonstrations against copyright-protection societies, Anonymous is now fully involved in a battle against WikiLeaks’ censors and detractors. At first we saw distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. Later, Anonymous went after Bank of America.
Let’s take a look at the chronology of actions supporting one of the two camps:
As we examine this chronology, it seems to me that something is out of place:
At this point, we need to ask whether Anonymous is behind all these actions or a criminal gang has gotten involved.
Whenever a big event occurs around the world (earthquake, celebrity death, popular feast day, etc.) cybercrime jumps at the chance to exploit it. And this appears to be the case with WikiLeaks and Anonymous. What an opportunity for criminals to take advantage of a volunteer army eager to take part in a struggle!
I am opposed to illegal activity on or off the Internet. I want to alert all hacktivists to be careful of engaging in any virtual demonstration when they cannot verify the launching source. Not only could their actions in fact be detrimental to their causes, they could also expose people to identity theft, financial fraud, and other troubles.
|
|
Tags: Cybercrime, Hacktivism
Anonymous is everyone and no one, so there’s no reason a “criminal gang” can’t also be Anonymous. The fact is that the majority of Anons willing to speak to any press or other outsiders are not the ones who do illegal activities, and may even disapprove of them. Trying to say that one group of Anons is “real” and the other is somehow illegitimate is a nonsensical assertion.
By all means, discourage people from engaging in the illegal actions, but trying to assassinate the character of Anonymous is an act of futility. We’re not the good guys, we just happen to be doing good.
Often it’s a “Lituanian Gang” or cybercriminals from other Baltic states, like those behind infamous “000webhostcom”, a massive botnet hiding behind the mask of free webhosting. Their activities range from “simple” spam to phishing and script-related hacking like that openly boasted about by a guy calling himself “AdSenseBoy”. His real name seems to be Mindaugas Lipskas, his acomplice or boss goes by the name of Aurimas Rapalis. So at least for them, without hiding their tracks well enough in earlier days they’re far from “Anonymous”, but US and EU (Baltic) authorities are either ignoring them or even (in Baltic states this is very likely) paid not to act…
The first sentence is incorrect as of 1-3-2011 only 1947 of 251,287 cables have been released.
They are being redacted by news organizations around the world to protect innocent people.
In general the cables are released as news organizations like the Guardian publish stories about them.
This article is a nice summary, however not entirely correct. The anti-Wikileaks, Anti-Anonymous hacker you call XerXes goes by the name of th3j35t3r. (read this as the Jester). He claims to be using a platform called XerXes for these attacks so i can see why you got confused. This platform most likely does not excist allthough he claims to have developed it himself. Fact is he’s using Dos-attack.
Anonymous did not attack Spamhaus, or approved of this attack. I think it’s plausible that Russian hackers are behind this attack since Spamhaus’ warning scared of potential victims. The fact that the URL is not on the list of real WikiLeaks mirrors at wikileaks.ch. proves to me that Anonymous had no motive for such an attack.
On a final note: if the idealist Anonymous activists are being prosecuted, then so should tj35t3r. Everybody has his own believes, morals, values and therefor his own opinion. It shouldn’t matter on which side you are but same laws should apply indiscrimenately.
Hi,
In general, I agree with your comments. Yes, XerXes is the tool and Jester is the attacker (as it is visible in the screenshots). I quickly amended this mistake after the blog was posted. Regarding the Spamhaus DDoS attack, I wrote near the end of this blog that the organization explained it was not carried out with LOIC nor LOIC-like tools, but with a conventional botnet. This fact confirms your opinion. And finally, yes, in our democracies, all people have to obey the law.
Thanks for your comments,
Francois
Native English speakers on a Russian host of questionable integrity are not indicative of a “Russian Gang” – simply a safer haven. Additionally, the Wikileaks issue is international so it should not cause any alarm bells to have any faction show up in any specific country. Not saying that Anonymous hasn’t been owned, however
, just not necessarily by the particular genre this post refers to. Nice post, in any case, an enjoyable read.
Submit your own comments / message for this post