#SecChat $1 million guarantee 12 Scams of Christmas access to live fraud resolution agents Acquisition Alex Thurber Android antivirus Apple botnet Channel Partners cloud security Compliance Consumer counter identity theft credit card fraud and protection credit fraud alerts credit monitoring credit monitoring and resolution critical infrastructure Cyber Security Mom cyberbullying Cybercrime cybermom data breach data center data center security Data Protection Dave DeWalt DLP Email & Web Security embedded encryption Endpoint Protection enterprise facebook fake anti-virus software Family Safety Friday Security Highlights global threat intelligence google government Hacktivism how to talk to kids how to talk to teens identity fraud identity fraud scams identity protection identity protection $1 million guarantee identity protection fraud identity protection surveillance identity surveillance identity theft identity theft expert identity theft fraud identity theft protection identity theft protection product Identity thieves and cybercriminals intel iphone kids online behavior lost wallet protection malware McAfee McAfee Channel McAfee Family Protection McAfee Identity Protection McAfee Initiative to Fight Cybercrime McAfee Labs McAfee security products Mid-Market Mobile mobile malware mobile security monitor credit and personal information Network Security online personal data protection online safety Operation Aurora PCI personal identity theft fraud personal information loss personal information protection phishing privacy proactive identity protection proactive identity surveillance Public Sector restore credit and personal identity Risk and Compliance scam scams scareware security smartphones social media social networking social networks spam Stuxnet twitter vulnerability Web 2.0 work with victim restore identity
|
|
It has been over 2 years since I last wrote about malware exploitation of a major vulnerability in the Windows Server Service (MS06-040) by malware.
In 2006, worm authors were quick to adopt the remotely executed exploit in just 4 day following a security update released as part of the regular Patch Tuesdays – IRC-Mocbot, W32/Sdbot, W32/Spybot, W32/Opanki, et ceteras.
Now in 2008, we are faced with malware authors, motivated by profits, more organized, and are more likely to target zero-day vulnerabilities, as we have reported on several critical incidents we have discovered since 2006. Like déjà vu, Microsoft released an out-of-cycle security update today to address in-the-wild attacks against a new MS08-067 vulnerability targeting the same Windows Server Service.
Attacks seen in the wild so far seem to have come from variants of the Spy-Agent.da trojan. When run, it may not be immediately apparent to the victim that it was using any exploits. Taking a quick glimpse into the binary code of basesvc.dll (Spy-Agent.da.dll), one of the DLL components installed by Spy-Agent.da, one can see strings that would look very familiar to those familiar with MS06-040.

On closer analysis, Spy-Agent.da.dll seeks out potentially vulnerable Windows machines in the local network, and sends maliciously crafted DCERPC requests to exploit the Server Service (SvrSvc).

When successful, hardcoded shellcode embedded within the malware, is executed on the targeted machines to download Spy-Agent.da (or possibly other variants or files) from a web server hosted in Japan.

(shellcode after decoding)
Just hours following the patch release, public source code has already been seen distributing on the Internet. What more can I say ? Patch your systems ! Yes, NOW !
Spy-Agent.da and Spy-Agent.da.dll are now detected using the current 5414 DATs. See Dave’s blog for McAfee’s coverage.
(thanks to Joey Koo and Xiaobo Chen for providing analysis data and packet dumps used in this blog)
|
|
[...] マイクãƒã‚½ãƒ•トã¯ä»Šå›žæ–°ãŸã«åˆ¤æ˜Žã—ãŸï¼Œå…¨ãåŒã˜Serverサービスã«é–¢ä¿‚ã™ã‚‹ã‚»ã‚ュリティ・ホール「MS08-067ã€ã¸ã®æŽªç½®ã¨ã—ã¦ï¼Œç·Šæ€¥ã®ã‚»ã‚ュリティ更新プãƒã‚°ãƒ©ãƒ をリリースã—㟠[...]
Hi,
I have been already gotten those samples.
And they can be detected in the 5414 DAT.
Thanks for your help.
How viable is this worm and successful is it at spreading on its own?
The data execution prevention feature is not normally used, as there is too much legitimate self-modifying code. Patch.
-Tom
Submit your own comments / message for this post