About Me

Craig Schmugar

Craig Schmugar

Read More

Feeds & Podcasts

Blogs

Meet the Bloggers

Archive

Tags

#SecChat $1 million guarantee 12 Scams of Christmas access to live fraud resolution agents Acquisition Alex Thurber Android antivirus Apple botnet Channel Partners cloud security Compliance Consumer counter identity theft credit card fraud and protection credit fraud alerts credit monitoring credit monitoring and resolution critical infrastructure Cyber Security Mom cyberbullying Cybercrime cybermom data breach data center data center security Data Protection Dave DeWalt DLP Email & Web Security embedded encryption Endpoint Protection enterprise facebook fake anti-virus software Family Safety Friday Security Highlights global threat intelligence google government Hacktivism how to talk to kids how to talk to teens identity fraud identity fraud scams identity protection identity protection $1 million guarantee identity protection fraud identity protection surveillance identity surveillance identity theft identity theft expert identity theft fraud identity theft protection identity theft protection product Identity thieves and cybercriminals intel iphone kids online behavior lost wallet protection malware McAfee McAfee Channel McAfee Family Protection McAfee Identity Protection McAfee Initiative to Fight Cybercrime McAfee Labs McAfee security products Mid-Market Mobile mobile malware mobile security monitor credit and personal information Network Security online personal data protection online safety Operation Aurora PCI personal identity theft fraud personal information loss personal information protection phishing privacy proactive identity protection proactive identity surveillance Public Sector restore credit and personal identity Risk and Compliance scam scams scareware security smartphones social media social networking social networks spam Stuxnet twitter vulnerability Web 2.0 work with victim restore identity

Searching for Malware Data Likely to Lead to More Malware

Wednesday, September 9, 2009 at 11:00am by Craig Schmugar
Craig Schmugar

It’s been a while since I blogged about Google Trends being abused to serve malware. However, recent attention around Google search poisoning led to me to check on things. It seems the attackers are being more selective in the search terms that they target–favoring those that have something to do with computer security. Hunting for poisoned search results based on random hot-search terms is hit or miss (and more miss than hit, at least in the top 10 results being poisoned). But terms that contained virus, trojan, rogue, and bulletin all lead to poisoned top search results. Some even lead to pages and pages of bogus links, which redirect to rogue anti-virus malware.

The following image is not intended to show the actual text of the search results, but rather it highlights the fact that four out of the top fifteen results are poisoned for one of today’s most searched terms at the time of this writing:

Starting from result number 20, the situation gets much worse–with dozens of poisoned results:

Granted, the link names on the second batch of results have nothing to do with the trojan search term I used. However, the attackers have set up thousands of pages that cross-link to each other, and contain various hot-search terms and content. So even if the long tail of poisoned results on any search term has a low conversion rate for that term, it can still serve to boost the score of other pages and terms that have a higher conversion rate.

Once a search user takes the bait, it’s business as usual for the attackers:


Graphic displayed while web page loads


Bogus warning message displayed from web page


Simulated system scan displayed from web page


Bogus scan results displayed from web page

Bookmark and Share

Submit your own comments / message for this post

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

 

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments (2)

  • Niels September 14, 2009 3:17PM

    The amount of spelling en grammar errors should also be a clue that the software is bogus. If the ‘scan results’ page came from a real company, their QA department should get fired.
    I wouldn’t have a lot of confidence in a product that sloppy.

  • Inforonics September 11, 2009 8:11AM

    This is a very clever yet sneaky way to infect even more computers. There is a great deal of search volume that revolves around PC safety and protection. I am guessing that this technique works well for them.