About Me

David Rayhawk

David Rayhawk

Read More

Feeds & Podcasts

Blogs

Meet the Bloggers

Archive

Tags

#SecChat $1 million guarantee 12 Scams of Christmas access to live fraud resolution agents Acquisition Alex Thurber Android antivirus Apple botnet Channel Partners cloud security Compliance Consumer counter identity theft credit card fraud and protection credit fraud alerts credit monitoring credit monitoring and resolution critical infrastructure Cyber Security Mom cyberbullying Cybercrime cybermom data breach data center data center security Data Protection Dave DeWalt DLP Email & Web Security embedded encryption Endpoint Protection enterprise facebook fake anti-virus software Family Safety Friday Security Highlights global threat intelligence google government Hacktivism how to talk to kids how to talk to teens identity fraud identity fraud scams identity protection identity protection $1 million guarantee identity protection fraud identity protection surveillance identity surveillance identity theft identity theft expert identity theft fraud identity theft protection identity theft protection product Identity thieves and cybercriminals intel iphone kids online behavior lost wallet protection malware McAfee McAfee Channel McAfee Family Protection McAfee Identity Protection McAfee Initiative to Fight Cybercrime McAfee Labs McAfee security products Mid-Market Mobile mobile malware mobile security monitor credit and personal information Network Security online personal data protection online safety Operation Aurora PCI personal identity theft fraud personal information loss personal information protection phishing privacy proactive identity protection proactive identity surveillance Public Sector restore credit and personal identity Risk and Compliance scam scams scareware security smartphones social media social networking social networks spam Stuxnet twitter vulnerability Web 2.0 work with victim restore identity

SMiShing – an emerging threat vector

Friday, August 25, 2006 at 3:06pm by David Rayhawk
David Rayhawk

Some cell phone users have started receiving SMS messages along these lines: “We’re confirming you’ve signed up for our dating service. You will be charged $2/day unless you cancel your order: www.smishinglink.com“. (This is an example and was not a real url at the time of writing)
This phenomena, which we at McAfee Avert Labs are dubbing “SMiShing” (phishing via SMS), is yet another indicator that cell phones and mobile devices are becoming increasingly used by perpetrators of malware, viruses and scams.

While some might recognize this as a scam, many unsuspecting users would not. Fearful of incurring premium rates on their cell phone bill, they visit the Web site highlighted in the message. Once they arrive at the URL, they are prompted to download a program which is actually a Trojan horse that turns the computer into a zombie, allowing it to be controlled by hackers. The computer then becomes part of a bot network, which can then be used to launch denial of service attacks, install keylogging software and steal personal account information and other malicious activities. Because monitoring botnet activity is complex, it is challeging to know the current scope of the problem.

Imagine the threat to enterprise networks once hackers learn how to fully exploit SMiShing techniques. Most large enterprises have thousands of employees, using a variety of devices to access their networks. Despite their best efforts to issue safety guidelines, IT security staff cannot control human behaviour-especially in light of the fact that mobile-users have not (yet) learned to treat their phones with the same level of concern that they apply to their laptops. Mobile devices present a serious challenge to data security, with the potential to infect both carrier and enterprise networks.

Enterprises would be wise to keep a close eye on this issue and think about policies for securing their mobile devices ahead of time, rather than playing catch up when it hits them, and begin to educate their employees about the potential risk now.

Bookmark and Share

Submit your own comments / message for this post

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

 

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Comments (1)

  • Dustin D. Trammell November 13, 2006 12:12PM

    Please, please, for the love of science stop coming up with more names for things that we arleady have names for. Phishing is phishing, SPAM is SPAM, regardless of the transport or delivery mechanims. Phishing over SMS (SMiShing???) is still just phishing, SPAM over Internet Telephony (SPIT) is still just SPAM. SPAM over Instant Messenger (SPIM) is, again, still just SPAM. There’s no point in differentiating so granularly other than to deliberately cause confusion. Of course, if you discover something truely unique, by all means coin a new term for it.

    Also, is this even technically phishing? It has the fake message component, however the collecting of personal information component is only one of the mentioned potential effects of installation of the trojan. If it were truly phishing I would expect the website to be collecting authentication credentials or something. The fact that the website provides a trojaned piece of software would make me expect it to be far more likely that the compromised host would be used as part of a botnet. This sounds much more like a common virus/trojan delivery technique than a phishing attack.